in News > Mortgage Servicing
print the content item


A former Fannie Mae executive is warning that plans being considered by several California localities to use eminent-domain laws for seizing and refinancing underwater mortgages will create more problems than solutions.

"This use of eminent domain will face serious legal challenges, and any attempt at implementation is fraught with problems," says Edward Pinto, former executive vice president, chief credit officer and senior vice president of marketing and product management at Fannie Mae and a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. "It certainly is not the free lunch being pitched to localities."

Pinto warns that legal problems may arise over whether eminent domain is being invoked for public use, adding that this could be litigated in the courts for years. He also stresses that the seizure of property has repercussions if the mortgages have been securitized.

"It strikes at the heart of the contractual relationship underpinning the securitization of mortgages and the relationship between lender and borrower," he says. "As with many of the actions that have been taken that are anti-investor, this will materially impact investors’ willingness to buy private mortgage-backed securities and to risk the capital needed to support these securities.

"Since this plan would be implemented locally," Pinto adds, "investors could decide not to invest in securities from these areas, raising rates for many borrowers in the effected localities, thereby making matters worse. This approach would be on top of other anti-investor actions. For example, private investors were not a party to the states' attorneys general national mortgage settlement, which provided for principle reduction paid from investor funds."

Pinto also states that eminent domain seizure is predicated on the pessimistic belief that none of the loans being targeted for government takeover will ever be paid off.

"This is akin to buying a right-of-way for a limited-access highway and condemning the more valuable portion of a property that fronts a road, but valuing that frontage based on lower non-frontage rates," he says. "Fundamental fairness would prohibit such cherry picking."




Latest Top Stories

CFPB, FTC, States Take Action Against Foreclosure Relief Companies

The CFPB says the three companies collected a total of more than $25 million in illegal advance fees for foreclosure relief.


The 'Widespread Contagion' Of Foreclosure Is Now Contained

RealtyTrac says in its midyear report that foreclosure activity has dwindled back down to historic levels and that it is on track to continue the pace.


New Housing Finance Reform Bill Introduced In Congress

Three congressmen are taking a new crack at balancing public and private involvement in housing finance.


Julian Castro Confirmed As HUD Secretary

The 39-year-old, third-term mayor of San Antonio will replace current HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan, who will next lead the White House Office of Management and Budget.


'Middle Ground' GSE Reform Proposal Would Keep Fannie, Freddie Alive

Proposal provides an explicit government guarantee "but taxpayer money will be protected through adequate private-sector capital and accurate pricing of government reinsurance."

LenderLive_id1241
Industry Resource
Hse SandyHook
Play for Pink
BSI_id
Safeguard_id1295
CMBA_id1228