in News > Mortgage Servicing
print the content item


A former Fannie Mae executive is warning that plans being considered by several California localities to use eminent-domain laws for seizing and refinancing underwater mortgages will create more problems than solutions.

"This use of eminent domain will face serious legal challenges, and any attempt at implementation is fraught with problems," says Edward Pinto, former executive vice president, chief credit officer and senior vice president of marketing and product management at Fannie Mae and a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a Washington, D.C.-based think tank. "It certainly is not the free lunch being pitched to localities."

Pinto warns that legal problems may arise over whether eminent domain is being invoked for public use, adding that this could be litigated in the courts for years. He also stresses that the seizure of property has repercussions if the mortgages have been securitized.

"It strikes at the heart of the contractual relationship underpinning the securitization of mortgages and the relationship between lender and borrower," he says. "As with many of the actions that have been taken that are anti-investor, this will materially impact investors’ willingness to buy private mortgage-backed securities and to risk the capital needed to support these securities.

"Since this plan would be implemented locally," Pinto adds, "investors could decide not to invest in securities from these areas, raising rates for many borrowers in the effected localities, thereby making matters worse. This approach would be on top of other anti-investor actions. For example, private investors were not a party to the states' attorneys general national mortgage settlement, which provided for principle reduction paid from investor funds."

Pinto also states that eminent domain seizure is predicated on the pessimistic belief that none of the loans being targeted for government takeover will ever be paid off.

"This is akin to buying a right-of-way for a limited-access highway and condemning the more valuable portion of a property that fronts a road, but valuing that frontage based on lower non-frontage rates," he says. "Fundamental fairness would prohibit such cherry picking."




Latest Top Stories

Virginia Sues 13 Banks For $1.15B Over Faulty RMBS

Virginia is suing 13 banks, including Citigroup, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs, for $1.15 billion over claims the institutions misled the state's retirement system about the sale of faulty RMBS.


Freddie Mac: Great Year So Far For Apartment Construction

Construction of condominium complexes is "scant," at least in comparison to 2006, and single-family construction is just "chugging along," Freddie Mac reports.


'Access To Affordable Mortgages Act' Introduced In The House

Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer, R-Mo., recently introduced the Access to Affordable Mortgages Act, which aims to exempt certain higher-risk loans from property appraisal requirements under the Truth in Lending Act.


Black Knight: HELOC Reset Storm Approaching

A report from Black Knight Financial Services shows that at least 2.5 million HELOCs will face resets over the next several years, resulting in an average increase of $250 per borrower monthly payment.


CFPB Selects Vendors And Lenders For Its Mortgage E-Closing Pilot

Five technology firms and seven lenders will participate in the CFPB's e-closing pilot, which will explore the viability of developing a standard process for closing mortgages using technology.

Urban Lending_id1351
Hse SandyHook
Industry Resource
Play for Pink
Safeguard_id1322
SWBC_id1313
FedHomeLoan_id1341